Searching for a Video Poker Winning Streak

Apparently, the idea behind this strategy is to jolt the device into a new winning streak by disrupting the current game. In all honesty with you, it might happen.

In a random game, streaks are possible. They cannot be predicted and they can not be forced. Switching to another game and right back will change the precise hands received, but one cannot change any streaks. Chances are a losing streak will continue, while an absolute streak starts.

The logic behind these tips is a different machine could have a different random number generator therefore the streaks should change. Much like the last advice, it might just work or not.

Whether switching between games on a single machine or switching machines, streaks can not be predicted. They'll be whatever they'll certainly be.

The logic behind this advice is that the hot machine has a tendency to remain hot and a cold one tends to remain cold. Therefore , if that takes place for you, go ahead and, grab it although it continues to be hot.

When playing video poker for hours at any given time, it is easy to start to see the streaks that happen. A hot streak can continue for a long time. There might be several long winning streaks intermixed with several short losing streaks. This is what makes a machine hot.

These suggestions falls in to the same area whilst the first two bits of advice. In a random game, nobody knows whenever a streak has ended, whenever a new streak starts or if the game is choppy with intermittent wins and losses. Just like the other words of advice, this may work or not.

This plan recommends changing the bet add up to mimic the winning and losing streaks. That's if you are losing, reduce steadily the amount bet, of course, if you are winning, increase this amount — down as you lose or over as you win.

This supposedly reduces the losses during losing streaks and escalates the wins during winning streaks.

There is certainly only one problem with the strategy — no one knows if the streak will end. It's entirely possible that as soon as the bets are decreased is exactly each time a winning streak starts. Or the reverse. This plan would work well if streaks could possibly be predicted. However they cannot.

The advice is the exact opposite of the prior strategy. Bet up as you lose and down as you win. The logic is that streaks need certainly to end of course, if without a doubt up during a losing streak you will sooner or later catch a winning streak and regain your losses more quickly as a result of the increased bets. The reverse will be true during a winning streak.

This concept may sound logical, but has got the same problem as other strategies — knowing whenever a streak will end and a fresh streak will begin. It might be easy when looking in the rearview mirror, but it is impossible anticipating.

That is a variation of the up as you lose strategy. The logic is that in the course of time there will be a winning hand. Take the win and begin the sequence again.

One betting sequence that is promoted is as follows:

• Bet one credit per hand for three hands. If you win, start over.
• Bet two credits per hand for three hands. If you win, start over.
• Bet three credits per hand for three hands. If you win, start over.
• Bet four credits per hand for three hands. If you win, start over.
• Bet five credits per hand for three hands. Start over when you win or after three losing hands.

The major pitfall with this strategy may be the large amount lost if the whole sequence is played with out a win. Also, starting over after having a win reduces the total amount won in a streaky game.

This strategy is difficult to play and offers absolutely no real advantage to the player.

In order to use this strategy, the player has to do some careful tracking.

Assume you are playing Jacks or Better where each four-of-a-kind is paid 25-for-1. This hand should appear once every 400 hands approximately. Assuming the player can play 800 hands per hour, this amounts to an average of one four-of-a-kind every half hour roughly.

The recommendation says that, if, after four to five hours of play there have been no four-of-a-kind hands, switch to either Double Bonus Poker, or Double-Double Bonus Poker. These games pay at the least 50-for-1 for a four-of-a-kind hand with some hands paying as high as 400-for-1.

The logic behind this strategy says that since no four-of-a-kind hand has appeared in quite a long time, it really is due to happen. Capitalize on that by playing a game that pays a bonus for the hand.

As with all the other strategies examined above, this might work or not.

There are several downsides to this strategy.

• There is the same problem of not knowing when a streak is going to end.
• Frequently the return of the go-to game is less than that of Jacks or Better.
• To be able to pay more for the four-of-a-kind hands, the pays for other hands, such as two pairs, must be reduced. The player will eventually lose more you should definitely getting a four-or-a-kind hand or better.
• The techniques for each game and paytable can be different. The strategy for Jacks or Better is quite not the same as that for Double-Double Bonus. Mistakes in play also reduces the get back of a game title.

Though every video poker player, pundit, casino worker, and casual acquaintance seemingly have a remedy for ending losing streaks, none of these really endure to the harsh reality of randomness. If streaks can not be predicted, no betting strategy or switching of games or machines can help.

What should a savvy video poker player do?

Here are a few tips:

• Play a high-return game to reduce overall losses (and sometimes even have an overall win).
• Make sure there is a large enough bankroll to sustain play during the inevitable losing streaks.
• Play smart. Know the proper playing strategy for the game being played and play it.

This advice will not end losing streaks, nonetheless it will keep players in the game long enough to weather them and reap some great benefits of a fantastic streak.